tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post5629485075653785859..comments2024-03-11T23:34:51.221+00:00Comments on Confessions of a Ci-Devant: The Other Boleyn Boy?: Did Anne Boleyn have another brother?Gareth Russellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09102113677858015813noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-51327884217971085182013-07-06T17:15:10.151+01:002013-07-06T17:15:10.151+01:00Great article. I have to disagree however - George...Great article. I have to disagree however - George was probably younger than Anne.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-68706437942653682682012-02-09T08:05:56.415+00:002012-02-09T08:05:56.415+00:00Gareth-love this blog of yours. How may I contact ...Gareth-love this blog of yours. How may I contact you directly regarding Tudor history. I have some things I'd like to share with you. Thank you. DawnAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-73665935449260122622011-09-14T19:31:48.005+01:002011-09-14T19:31:48.005+01:00Gareth, thank you so much for your time.
Kind of i...Gareth, thank you so much for your time.<br />Kind of icky-feeling to know the current royals are offspring of Thomas Boleyn, who is always depicted as the ultimate creep - but when one does the math of a family tree, one is bound to find villians.tubbshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07272003035464034763noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-30504230759960461672011-09-12T15:14:02.543+01:002011-09-12T15:14:02.543+01:00Mary Boleyn's other child, Henry, was born in ...Mary Boleyn's other child, Henry, was born in 1526, it is presumed - long after his mother's liaison with Henry VIII would have ended. Due to his mother's financial concerns after her husband's death, from which she seems to have inherited nothing but debts, Henry's education was initially funded by his aunt, the queen. Aged about nineteen, he was married to Anne Morgan, one Gareth Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09102113677858015813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-77368544599700358032011-09-12T15:13:56.810+01:002011-09-12T15:13:56.810+01:00Hi Tubbs.
The answers to your two questions merge...Hi Tubbs.<br /><br />The answers to your two questions merge quite conveniently. Anne does indeed have collateral descendants alive today - many, in fact and many of them very influential - and all of them through her sister's offspring.<br /><br />Unfortunately, despite recent attempts by G.W. Bernard in his books "The King's Reformation" and "Anne Boleyn: Fatal Gareth Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09102113677858015813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-11904567960573158432011-09-05T01:27:57.354+01:002011-09-05T01:27:57.354+01:00I have two Boleyn questions:
(1)Did Anne Boleyn h...I have two Boleyn questions: <br />(1)Did Anne Boleyn have any collateral descendants?<br />(2) Anne's sister ("the other Boleyn girl") was gotten pregnant by King Henry. Whatever became of that child?tubbshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07272003035464034763noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3354677738876576370.post-15334823963419891142011-09-04T07:37:41.368+01:002011-09-04T07:37:41.368+01:00Hi Gareth,
Thanks for writing about my investigati...Hi Gareth,<br />Thanks for writing about my investigation and article. In her book, Alison Weir said that the brass was marked 1520 and then, when I pointed out to her that it wasn't, she published the article on her website giving sources for why she still believed the tomb to be dated to 1520. Unfortunately, her conclusions ride on the "c.1520" Ashmolean dating of the brass which Claire Ridgwayhttp://www.theanneboleynfiles.comnoreply@blogger.com